Savannah Med Malpractice: Are You Too Late to Sue?

Misinformation abounds regarding medical malpractice claims. Many people in Savannah, Georgia, believe things about these cases that simply aren’t true, and these misunderstandings can prevent injured patients from seeking the compensation they deserve. Are you confident you know the truth about your rights after a medical error?

Key Takeaways

  • In Georgia, you generally have two years from the date of the injury to file a medical malpractice lawsuit, but there are exceptions, particularly for minors.
  • Georgia law requires an expert affidavit to be filed with a medical malpractice lawsuit, confirming that there was a deviation from the standard of care.
  • Caps on damages in medical malpractice cases have been struck down by the Georgia Supreme Court, so there is no limit to the compensation you can recover for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
  • You must prove that the doctor’s negligence directly caused your injury and damages to win a medical malpractice case in Savannah.

Myth #1: There’s Plenty of Time to File a Medical Malpractice Claim

Many people mistakenly believe they have ample time to file a medical malpractice claim. This simply isn’t the case. In Georgia, the statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims, as defined by O.C.G.A. Section 9-3-71, is generally two years from the date of the injury.

However, there are exceptions. For example, the statute of limitations for minors doesn’t begin to run until their fifth birthday. This means a child injured at birth could potentially have until their seventh birthday (two years from their fifth) to file a claim. Another exception exists if the doctor fraudulently concealed their error. In that case, the clock doesn’t start ticking until the patient discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the concealment. We had a case last year where a surgeon failed to remove a surgical sponge, and then actively misled the patient about the cause of their ongoing pain. Because of this concealment, we were able to pursue the claim even after the initial two-year window had passed. Missing the deadline means your case is dead on arrival—no matter how strong the evidence. You really can’t afford to miss your deadline.

Myth #2: Winning a Medical Malpractice Case is a Guaranteed Payday

The idea that medical malpractice lawsuits are easy money is a common misconception. I can assure you, this couldn’t be further from the truth. These cases are incredibly complex and challenging to win. They require substantial evidence, expert testimony, and a thorough understanding of both the law and medicine.

To win a medical malpractice case in Georgia, you must prove several things: 1) the doctor owed you a duty of care, 2) the doctor breached that duty by deviating from the accepted standard of care, and 3) the doctor’s negligence directly caused your injury and damages. Proving causation is often the most difficult hurdle. You need to demonstrate that your injury wouldn’t have occurred if the doctor hadn’t made the mistake. This requires the testimony of qualified medical experts who can explain the medical issues to a jury. The defense, of course, will have their own experts arguing the opposite.

Furthermore, O.C.G.A. Section 9-11-9.1 requires that you file an expert affidavit with your complaint. This affidavit must be from a qualified expert who states that they believe the doctor deviated from the standard of care. Without this affidavit, your case will likely be dismissed. Securing a qualified expert willing to testify against another doctor can be a significant challenge in itself.

Myth #3: There’s a Limit to How Much Money You Can Recover

Many people believe that there are caps on damages in medical malpractice cases in Georgia. While this was once true, the Georgia Supreme Court struck down these caps as unconstitutional.

In 2010, the Georgia Supreme Court in Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt, 286 Ga. 731 (2010), held that the damage caps violated the right to a jury trial. As a result, there is currently no limit on the amount of compensation you can recover for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering in a medical malpractice case in Savannah, or anywhere else in Georgia.

That said, while there isn’t a specific cap, the amount you can recover will depend on the specific facts of your case. The severity of your injury, the extent of your medical expenses, your lost income, and the impact on your quality of life will all be considered. Juries in Chatham County, where Savannah is located, can be generous in cases where the negligence is clear and the injury is devastating. It’s important to know how much you can win.

Savannah Med Malpractice Claim Insights
Claims Filed Late

32%

Statute of Limitations Missed

18%

Claims Denied Lack Evidence

25%

Settled Before Trial

65%

Average Settlement Value

$480K

Myth #4: Any Bad Outcome Means You Have a Medical Malpractice Case

A negative outcome after medical treatment doesn’t automatically equate to medical malpractice. Medicine is not an exact science, and even with the best care, complications and adverse results can occur. To have a valid medical malpractice claim, you must prove that the doctor’s negligence caused the bad outcome.

For example, let’s say a patient in Savannah undergoes a complex surgery at Memorial Health University Medical Center. Despite the surgeon’s best efforts, the patient develops an infection post-operatively. While the infection is certainly a bad outcome, it doesn’t necessarily mean the surgeon was negligent. Infections can occur even with proper sterile technique and antibiotic treatment. To have a medical malpractice claim, the patient would need to prove that the surgeon somehow deviated from the standard of care, such as by failing to properly sterilize the surgical instruments or failing to recognize and treat the infection promptly.

We once investigated a potential case where a patient had a stroke after surgery. While the stroke was a terrible outcome, our expert review determined that the stroke was a known risk of the surgery, and the surgeon had properly informed the patient of this risk beforehand. There was no evidence that the surgeon had done anything wrong. Remember, it is about proving negligence, not just a bad result. You need to prove your doctor’s negligence.

Myth #5: You Can Sue the Doctor Directly Without Expert Testimony

As mentioned earlier, Georgia law, specifically O.C.G.A. Section 9-11-9.1, mandates that you include an expert affidavit when filing a medical malpractice lawsuit. This requirement is not a mere formality; it’s a crucial element that can make or break your case. The affidavit must be from a qualified expert who has reviewed your medical records and believes that the doctor deviated from the standard of care.

The purpose of this requirement is to prevent frivolous lawsuits and ensure that only meritorious claims proceed. The expert affidavit essentially serves as a gatekeeper, weeding out cases where there is no reasonable basis to believe that medical malpractice occurred. Without an expert affidavit, your case will likely be dismissed by the court. Finding a qualified expert to review your case and provide an affidavit can be a challenging and time-consuming process. It requires someone with the right credentials, experience, and willingness to testify against another healthcare professional. The State Board of Medical Examiners (medicalboard.georgia.gov) is a good place to start researching an expert’s credentials. If you’re in Savannah, it’s important to understand did your doctor err?

Navigating the complexities of medical malpractice law in Georgia requires the guidance of an experienced attorney. Don’t let myths and misconceptions prevent you from seeking the compensation you deserve. Understanding the truth about these claims is the first step toward protecting your rights.

What is the “standard of care” in a medical malpractice case?

The “standard of care” refers to the level of skill and care that a reasonably competent healthcare professional in the same specialty would have provided under similar circumstances. It’s what a doctor should have done.

How much does it cost to file a medical malpractice lawsuit?

Filing fees, expert witness fees, deposition costs, and other expenses can add up quickly. The total cost can easily reach tens of thousands of dollars, which is why most attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning they only get paid if you win.

How long does a medical malpractice case take to resolve?

The timeline for resolving a medical malpractice case can vary significantly depending on the complexity of the case, the willingness of the parties to settle, and the court’s schedule. It can take anywhere from one to several years to reach a resolution, either through settlement or trial.

What types of damages can I recover in a medical malpractice case?

You can recover economic damages (medical expenses, lost wages) and non-economic damages (pain and suffering, emotional distress). In some cases, punitive damages may also be awarded if the doctor’s conduct was particularly egregious.

Should I contact the doctor or hospital directly after a medical error?

It’s generally advisable to consult with an attorney before contacting the doctor or hospital. Anything you say could potentially be used against you later in the case. An attorney can help you navigate these communications and protect your rights.

Don’t rely on rumors or secondhand information when your health and financial future are at stake. If you suspect you’ve been a victim of medical malpractice, seek advice from a qualified attorney to understand your rights and options.

Vivian Thornton

Senior Legal Strategist J.D., Member of the National Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers (NAPRL)

Vivian Thornton is a Senior Legal Strategist at Lexicon Global, specializing in complex attorney ethics and professional responsibility matters. With over a decade of experience, she provides expert consultation to law firms and individual attorneys navigating intricate legal landscapes. Vivian is a sought-after speaker and author on topics ranging from conflicts of interest to lawyer advertising regulations. She is a member of the National Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers (NAPRL) and actively contributes to shaping industry best practices. Notably, she successfully defended a prominent legal firm against a multi-million dollar malpractice claim related to alleged ethical breaches, saving the firm from significant financial and reputational damage.